The Daily Wail, shows its true colours re: GID kids

Printer-friendly version

Well, it had to happen, after a fairly sensitive article in the Sun, the self-righteous Daily Wail attacked, showing the forces of repression are in fine fettle. Makes the one in the Guardian look wonderful, hell it makes the one in the Sun look good.

For those with hypertension, maybe not a good idea to click on the link.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2106215/Mixed-year-o...

Angharad

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
joannebarbarella's picture

One Of The Nastiest Pieces of "Journalism" Ever

This really leaves a bad taste in the mouth, but to make it even worse, read the comments and see what kind of lovely people read the rag (Angharad excepted!).

Naturally they quote Zucker with his phony analogies and his "nurture not nature" balderdash. Shades of John Money!!

And, irony of ironies, they sneer at "negotiations with a tabloid newspaper".

I think I'm going to vomit,

Joanne

I thought the article was bad...

Until they pulled the statistics out of the hat, then I lost it. What junk!

Pandering To Their Readers

The comments to the article are illuminating. Small minds, set opinions, obvious agendas, bitter words.

___________________

Ignorant people behave ignorantly.

lesleycharles's picture

I think this article deserves

I think this article deserves a nice razzberry.

The Daily Wail, shows its true colours re: GID kids

Proves that some papers are only goof for recycling

    Stanman
May Your Light Forever Shine
cyclist's picture

Daily Hate

No surprises there from that cesspit. The usual bottom-feeder comments as well, and rabid 'red-arrow' treatment for anyone who tries to talk the TG case. In the middle of the green-ink rants is a comment that 'lazy public-sector workers' are targetting small children because they are less work than teenagers.

Edited to add: the line about children with 25-year-old transsexuals...what is the median age for nurses, or doctors? And all the usual conflation with sexuality. Having seen this story in both the Sun (a truly shitty paper) and the giveaway Metro, I see the Hate sneers at a deal with a tabloid newspaper. Two things: firstly, the press in the UK traditionally divides into two, the 'quality' broadsheets and the less elevated tabloids. The tabloids also have, at their lowest level, the redtops, like the Sun. The Hate Mail considers itself a broadsheet in all but physical size. What it means by 'tabloid deal' is simply that they didn't buy the story first, so they are shitting on the child--er, I mean, taking a principled stance to Protect Our Nation's Vulnerable Children.

What a surprise!

They didn't use my comment.

Angharad

cyclist's picture

It was irrelevant

..unless you nentioned house prices, the PC Lobby or how eating a particular item both causes and cures cancer. Or perhaps you spoke sense.

Seriously, what do you expect?

There are some evil people in this world, and many of them work for the Daily Mail.

Personally, I think it's better to ignore them, rather than giving them credibility by arguing with them.

Extravagance's picture

I'd better not read this one.

Somebody might die horribly...

Honorable Cat-Vboy.PNG
The text above has a peach background. I'm not as pretty as a peach, peaches are as pretty as me. ^_^

x

nevermind, fuck it

cyclist's picture

Funnily enough

Your edited comment is probably the best reaction to the crap from the Daily Hate. Pity so many arseholes read and believe the rag. Cut it into squares, thread it on string and use it ...

joannebarbarella's picture

Nah!

It's far too coarse and even shit wouldn't stick to it.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


F E A T U R E S
Syndicate content