Diversion

Printer-friendly version

Sometimes it's fun to think of something totally inconsequential, when thinking of other things is too painful.

When I look at the list of my stories I nearly always notice the number of daily hits. It can be assumed that a number of those hits are "bots".

Does anyone have an opinion as to what percentage of hits are "bots"?

Beyond that, I've heard that "bots" now have the AI capability to read for content. Does that make anyone else wonder if the "bots" are finding explanations in what they read on BC for long-held feelings of digital discontent?

It seems to me that gender is located mainly between the ears and only inconsequentially between the legs. That being the case, doesn't it seem likely that 1% to 2% of the AI "bots" would be transgendered?

Is that inconsequential enough for you?

Jill