Supreme Court Unanimous

A word from our sponsor:

Submitted by on

Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Blog About: 

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/07/same-sex-adop...

Same sex couple that adopt keep their rights based upon the state where they adopted.

Comments

In many ways, this is a

Submitted by on

In many ways, this is a reaffirmation of a concept that's been part of the constitution from the very beginning (the Articles). Even if your state doesn't like what another state does, it has no right to abrogate that state's decisions. It's only been acceptably broken one time in US history. (As in people just accept that it was 'right' to break it, not that it actually _was_ right)

I'll get a life when it's proven and substantiated to be better than what I'm currently experiencing.

Up until a few decades ago it

Submitted by on

Up until a few decades ago it was done frequently regarding marriages, some states refused to recognize interracial marriages no matter the fact that it was a direct affront to the US Constitution.

I'm told STFU more times in a day than most people get told in a lifetime

I was referring to court and

Submitted by on

I was referring to court and public opinion, rather than what a state did internally with no outside oversight.

I'll get a life when it's proven and substantiated to be better than what I'm currently experiencing.

In the article the crux of

Submitted by on

In the article the crux of the case was one state telling another state "you shouldn't have done that in the first place" rather than ignoring the Constitutional rights of a parent.

Basically, it was one state telling another what they can and can't do and what they should and shouldn't which is not only against 228 years of history, it's ludicrous!

I'm told STFU more times in a day than most people get told in a lifetime

More like this